Idea Statica
Acier
Aperçu de l'acier
Conception d'assemblages
Conception d’éléments en acier
Conception paramétrique
Études de cas sur l'acier
Béton
Aperçu concret
Voiles et details
Conception d’éléments en béton
Ancrage
Membre & Section transversale
Études de cas en béton
Liens BIM
Aperçu du BIM
Intégrations supportées
Checkbot
Viewer
API
Assistance et formation
Centre d'assistance (ENG)
Campus - Formation en ligne
Webinaires
Blog
À télécharger
Octroi de licences
Tarification – Prix
Demandez un devis
Licence entreprise
Calculatrices de valeur
Étudiants et universités
Entreprise
Contact
Career
Partners
Projects clients
Études de cas
Essai de 14 jours
Safety factors
Safety factors
ConcreteKnowledge baseDetail 2DEN (Eurocode)Cracks

Safety factors

Cet article est également disponible en
ENDEFR

The Compatible Stress Field Method is compliant with modern design codes. As the calculation models only use standard material properties, the partial safety factor format prescribed in the design codes can be applied without any adaptation. In this way, the input loads are factored, and the characteristic material properties are reduced using the respective safety coefficients prescribed in design codes, exactly as in conventional concrete analysis. Values of material safety factors prescribed in EN 1992-1-1 chap. 2.4.2.4 are set by default, but user can change safety factors in Setup (Fig. 31).

\[ \textsf{\textit{\footnotesize{Fig. 31\qquad The setting of  material safety factors in Idea StatiCa Detail.}}}\]


Load safety factors has to be defined by user in Combination rule for each non-linear combination of load cases (Fig. 32). For all templates implemented in Idea StatiCa Detail, partial safety factors are already predefined.

\[ \textsf{\textit{\footnotesize{Fig. 32\qquad The setting of  load partial factors in Idea StatiCa Detail.}}}\]


By using appropriate user-defined combinations of partial safety factors, users can also compute with the CSFM using the global resistance factor method (Navrátil, et al. 2017), but this approach is hardly ever used in design practice. Some guidelines recommend using the global resistance factor method for non-linear analysis. However, in simplified non-linear analyses (such as the CSFM), which only require those material properties that are used in conventional hand calculations, it is still more desirable to use the partial safety format.