Idea Statica
Acero
Panorama del acero
Diseño de conexiones
Diseño de miembros
Diseño paramétrico
Casos prácticos del acero
Hormigón
Resumen del hormigón
Diseño de muros y detalles
Diseño de anclaje
Miembros y secciones
Casos prácticos concretos
Enlaces BIM
Visión general de BIM
Integraciones compatibles
Checkbot
Viewer
APIs
Apoyo y aprendizaje
Resumen del soporte
Centro de asistencia
Curso e-learning
Blog
Descargas y licencias
Precios
Usuarios estándar
Clientes empresariales
Estudiantes y Universidades
Value calculators
Nosotros
Quiénes somos
Contacto
Investigación y desarrollo
Distribuidores autorizados
Conozca a nuestros clientes
Prueba de 14 días
Comparison of the Buckling Resistance of SHS and RHS Profiles
Comparison of the Buckling Resistance of SHS and RHS Profiles
SteelMember designVerificationsEN (Eurocode)Buckling

Comparison of the Buckling Resistance of SHS and RHS Profiles

Este artículo también está disponible en
ENDEESNL

RHS and SHS models in IDEA StatiCa Member are compared to the corresponding models in Abaqus and hand calculations according to EN 1993-1-1 and EN 1993-1-5. This verification study is focused on local and global buckling simulated with advanced analyses.

The study contains a great number of numerical models of SHS and RHS profiles loaded by compressive force, bending moment and their combination. Numerical models are investigated by linear buckling analysis (LBA) and geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis with imperfections (GMNIA).

Highlights:

  • An overview of imperfections for global and local buckling in EN 1993-1-1 and EN 1993-1-5 is given and various options are compared.
  • Practical recommendations for modeling imperfections including a flowchart are provided.

Conclusions:

  • Linear buckling analysis: IDEA StatiCa Member provides very similar results to Abaqus with a difference below 5%. 
  • Geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis with imperfections: IDEA StatiCa Member provides very similar results to Abaqus with a difference below 5%.
  • This level of deviation is common and well within the range of acceptability.
  • Class 4 sections may be safely used by IDEA StatiCa Member with correct imperfection settings.


The full report is attached.


Author: Andreas Müller M.Sc.

Responsible investigator: Prof. Dr. techn. Andreas Taras

ETH Zurich, Institute of Structural Engineering (IBK)