Designing steel-to-concrete connections is a key, safety-critical task on many construction projects. Based on Hilti’s research published in the New Civil Engineer magazine which explored the experience of more than 100 practicing civil engineers, 79% claim to spend up to 4 hours on designing a typical steel-to-concrete connection and producing of a report.
According to the engineering experience, with the right selection of software tools, the design time taken for one individual connection is slashed by an average of 50%. Based on our own research on more than 600 structural engineers who filled in data in our Effectivity Calculator, the time cut-downs on very complex connections can reach even 80%.
All according to the code, but which one?
When the Eurocode was first developed, the anchoring design was not established well enough to warrant inclusion within the EN design standards. Mostly, they were covered by ETAG 001 developed by EOTA (European Organisation for Technical Assessment), including 2 key annexes - C and E.
For the benefit of the design engineer, all these design guidelines are now merged under the new design document EN 1992-4, which is now an enforceable design standard in countries under the EN umbrella, with adoption nearly complete. However, the core of EN 1992-4 carries over many of the design provisions of ETAG 001: Annex C, TR 029, and TR 045 and, as such, differences are limited.
But EN is not the only standard covered by IDEA StatiCa. See the chart below with all codes included in IDEA StatiCa for anchoring.
Supported codes for anchoring in IDEA StatiCa
| EN | EN 1992-4 |
| AISC | AISC 360-16-J9 ACI 318-14-Chapter 17 |
| CISC | CSA a23.3-14 |
| AUS | AS 5216:2018 |
The other codes supported by IDEA Statica (China, Hong Kong, Russia, India) do not have a direct prescription for anchoring design. Check of concrete in compression is covered for all codes.

